Phase-change random access memory (pram) write disturb mitigation

ABSTRACT

A method for writing memory cells including: applying a program voltage to a target wordline; grounding bitlines of memory cells to be written to a first resistance state; setting a bitline voltage of unselected bitlines; and setting a wordline voltage of unselected wordlines; applying the program voltage to a target bitline; grounding wordlines of the memory cells to be written to a second resistance state; setting the wordline voltage of the unselected wordlines to a first value if a peak of a maximum voltage drop is greater than or equal to a second value; otherwise, setting the wordline voltage to zero; and setting the bitline voltage of the unselected bitlines to a third value if the peak of the maximum voltage drop is greater than or equal to the second value; otherwise, setting the bitline voltage to zero.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Exemplary embodiments of the present inventive concept relate to writemethods of nonvolatile memory devices, and more particularly, to anonvolatile memory device write method with reduced write disturbs.

DISCUSSION OF RELATED ART

Phase-change random access memory (PRAM) has improved scaling potentialcompared to traditional memory technologies. In order to obtain smallfeature size and enable capacity through vertical stacks, propervertical three-dimensional architecture is required. Cross-pointstructures, where separate wordline and bitline wire bars (or planes asin V-PRAM) are connected with variable-resistance materials, are able toexploit PRAM's inherent characteristics and take advantage of processvertical buildup while tolerating high temperatures. However, thecross-point construction raises reliability and power consumptionchallenges.

Write disturb phenomenon occurs in cross-point formation when applying awrite voltage for target cells. Since all cells in a row share the samewordline, the potential is applied to every cell. In a SET operation(e.g., setting low-resistance by positive top-to-bottom electrodes)cells that are meant to be changed have a ground connection in theirassociated bitline. Cells that have to retain their resistance shellhave a bitline voltage that minimizes their voltage drop which causesdisturb. If the bitlines in those cells are set to write voltage, theirvoltage drop and disturb reduces to zero. However, corresponding cellsthat are located in the same bitline and unselected wordlines now havewrite potential in their bottom electrode, requiring their wordlinevoltage to be the same which leads to setting low-resistance inunselected cells.

Conventional write schemes tackle write voltage disturbs by V/2 or V/3settings. In V/2, the unselected wordlines and bitlines are biased withhalf of a write voltage. FIG. 1A demonstrates such a configuration witha 5×3 array matrix. Wordline (WL) rows are placed above the bitlines(BL) and each intersection connects WL to BL within a PRAM device. Thecentered cell is meant to be written and is marked with a full circle.The unfilled circles are cells that are affected by write disturb. Cellsthat share a bitline with written cells and cells on the same wordlinethat are not meant to be written have voltage drop disturb at V/2magnitude. Due to limited SET/RESET endurance cycles, and sinceefficient error-correction schemes exist for a binary symmetric channel,it can be assumed that data would be scrambled to binary IID Bernoulli-½probability for each bit. In this case, nearly half of each wordlinecontains high-resistance cells and therefore about half of an arraymatrix would suffer from right disturb. In V/3, unselected wordlines arebiased with V/3 and =selected bitlines with 2V/3, as shown in FIG. 1B.This approach is to reduce the voltage's disturb magnitude to |V/3| butnearly all array cells are affected, both in a single bit flip andrandom wordline data distribution (unwanted cells in the same row as awritten cell are biased with ±V/3, other cells in different wordlinesare affected by V/3).

SUMMARY

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present inventive concept,there is provided a method for writing memory cells in a nonvolatilememory device comprising wordlines overlapping bitlines, the methodcomprising: in a first phase: applying a program pulse voltage to atarget wordline; grounding bitlines of memory cells to be written to afirst resistance state; setting a bitline voltage of unselectedbitlines; and setting a wordline voltage of unselected wordlines; in asecond phase: applying the program pulse voltage to a target bitline;grounding wordlines of the memory cells to be written to a secondresistance state; setting the wordline voltage of the unselectedwordlines to a first value if a peak of a maximum voltage drop overmemory cells which were not meant to be changed is greater than or equalto a second value, and setting the wordline voltage to zero if the peakof the maximum voltage drop is not greater than or equal to the secondvalue; and setting the bitline voltage of the unselected bitlines to athird value if the peak of the maximum voltage drop is greater than orequal to the second value, and setting the bitline voltage to zero ifthe peak of the maximum voltage drop is not greater than or equal to thesecond value.

The first phase is a set phase and the second phase is a reset phase.

The nonvolatile memory device is phase-change random access memory.

The first resistance state is a low resistance state the secondresistance state is a high resistance state.

The wordlines and the bitlines form an M×N array, wherein M and N areeach integers greater than one, and wherein the bitline voltage of theunselected bitlines is represented by

${V_{BL} = {\frac{2}{M + 1}V_{PP}}},$

where V_(BL) is the bitline voltage of the unselected bitlines andV_(PP) is the program pulse voltage.

The wordlines and the bitlines form an M×N array, wherein M and N areeach integers greater than one, and wherein the wordline voltage of theunselected wordlines is represented by

${V_{WL} = {\frac{1}{M + 1}V_{PP}}},$

where V_(WL) is the wordline voltage of the unselected bitlines andV_(PP) is the program pulse voltage.

The first value is (0.9965-0.9934 α) multiplied by the program pulsevoltage, wherein α is a value between zero and one.

The third value is (0.4982-0.4967 α) multiplied by the program pulsevoltage, wherein α is a value between zero and one.

The second value is the program pulse voltage divided by 3.

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present inventive concept,there is provided a method for writing memory cells in a nonvolatilememory device comprising wordlines overlapping bitlines, the methodcomprising: in a first phase: applying a program pulse voltage to atarget wordline; grounding bitlines of memory cells to be written to afirst resistance state; grounding unselected bitlines and wordlines; ina second phase: applying the program pulse voltage to a target bitline;grounding wordlines of the memory cells to be written to a secondresistance state; setting a wordline voltage of the unselectedwordlines; and setting a bitline voltage of the unselected bitlines.

The first phase is a set phase and the second phase is a reset phase.

The nonvolatile memory device is phase-change random access memory.

The first resistance state is a low resistance state the secondresistance state is a high resistance state.

The wordline voltage is represented by

${V_{WL} = \frac{2\; V_{PP}}{3}},$

where V_(WL) is the wordline voltage and V_(PP) is the program pulsevoltage.

The bitline voltage is represented by

${V_{BL} = \frac{V_{PP}}{3}},$

where V_(BL) is the bitline voltage and V_(PP) is the program pulsevoltage.

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present inventive concept,there is provided a method for writing memory cells in a nonvolatilememory device comprising wordlines overlapping bitlines, the methodcomprising: applying a program pulse voltage to a target wordline;grounding bitlines of memory cells to be written to a first resistancestate; setting a bitline voltage of unselected bitlines; setting awordline voltage of unselected wordlines; applying the program pulsevoltage to a target bitline; grounding wordlines of the memory cells tobe written to a second resistance state; and setting the wordlinevoltage of the unselected wordlines to a first value if a peak maximumvoltage drop of memory cells which were not meant to be changed isgreater than or equal to a second value.

The method further comprises setting the wordline voltage to zero if thepeak maximum voltage drop is not greater than or equal to the secondvalue.

The method further comprises setting the bitline voltage of theunselected bitlines to a third value if the peak maximum voltage drop isgreater than or equal to the second value.

The method further comprises setting the bitline voltage to zero if thepeak maximum voltage drop is not greater than or equal to the secondvalue.

The nonvolatile memory device is phase-change random access memory.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The above and other features of the present inventive concept willbecome apparent from the following description taken in conjunction withthe accompanying figures in which:

FIG. 1A illustrates a conventional write scheme;

FIG. 1B illustrates another conventional write scheme;

FIG. 2 illustrates parametric modeling of array cell voltage-dropsduring a write operation in cross-point phase-change random accessmemory (PRAM), according to an exemplary embodiment of the inventiveconcept;

FIG. 3 illustrates a power tinction computing in accordance with anexemplary embodiment of the inventive concept versus unselected wordlineand bitline voltages;

FIG. 4A illustrates optimization results for minimum average disturbsand power consumption, according to an exemplary embodiment of theinventive concept;

FIG. 4B is additional tabular data for FIG. 4A;

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate a write scheme that minimizes the averagevoltage disturb and power, according to an exemplary embodiment of theinventive concept;

FIG. 6 illustrates a write process for minimal park disturb per cell,according to an exemplary embodiment of the inventive concept;

FIG. 7 illustrates gain analysis results of algorithms 1 and 2 accordingto exemplary embodiments of the inventive concept compared toconventional write schemes of V/2 and V/3;

FIG. 8 illustrates gain difference between algorithms 1 and 2 and writeschemes of V/2 and V/3; and

FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating a phase change memory deviceaccording to an exemplary embodiment of the inventive concept.

It is to be understood that the values in the figures are provided forreference example, and thus, the inventive concept is not limitedthereto.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the inventive concept,there is provided a write algorithm that can reduce voltage disturb andleakage power dissipation, thereby enabling reliability and reducingcost.

Hereinafter, power consumption and disturb of a phase-change randomaccess memory (PRAM) cross-point matrix as a function orwordlinelbitline voltages is modeled, and power optimization withconstrained peak voltage per cell is performed. The power-efficientwrite algorithm according to an exemplary embodiment of the inventiveconcept is then presented.

Constrained Power-Optimized Write Operation

A. Notations

Notation 1 (Write operation in M×N array matrix): the memory cell arrayis marked to have M rows and N columns. Each write operation is done inwordline granularity and has two steps: first set the low-resistancestates (positive worline-to-bitline voltage) and second write tohigh-resistance cells. This write order is referred to asSET-before-RESET, which the reverse order is RESET-before-SET.

Notation 2 (Program pulse voltage): the voltage magnitude that isrequired for a program (SET write, low resistance state—LRS) pulse isdenoted with V_(PP) or simply V. The negative voltage with the samevalue is used for RESET (setting high resistance state—HRS).

Notation 3 (Unselected wordline/bitline voltage): the applied potentialfor unselected wordlines and bitlines is marked with A_(WL) and V_(BL).The abbreviations for wordline and bitline are WL and BL, respectively.

Notation 4 (Redundant power dissipation): when performing a writeoperation, unwanted voltage drops (marked V_(U)) may apply on memorycells that are not meant to be changed. This voltage multiplied by theresulting current through the device I_(U) is referred to as redundantpower dissipation during write and denoted with P_(U). For the setS={V_(U1), V_(U2), . . . } of different possiHe V_(U) values and foreach resistance R_(j) out of R={R₀, R₁, . . . , R_(L−1)}, the number ofcorresponding affected cells is denoted G(V_(U1), R_(j)). Therefore,P_(U) is:

${P_{U}\left( {S,R} \right)} = {{\sum_{V_{Ui} \in S}\left( {\sum_{R_{j} \in R}{{I_{Ui}\left( R_{j} \right)}{V_{Ui} \cdot {G\left( {V_{Ui},R_{j}} \right)}}}} \right)} = {\sum_{V_{Ui} \in S}\left( {\sum_{R_{j} \in R}{\frac{V_{Ui}^{2}}{R_{j}} \cdot {G\left( {V_{Ui},R_{j}} \right)}}} \right)}}$

It is to be assumed that data is randomized to binary IID Bernoulli-½distribution, and therefore the number of cells with voltage drop V_(U1)(denoted G(V_(U1))) is scattered equally among resistance levels:G(V_(U1))/L cells for each level. In a memory array that occupies cellswith L levels:

${P_{U}(S)} = {\frac{R_{eq}}{L}{\sum_{V_{Ui} \in S}\left( {V_{Ui}^{2} \cdot {G\left( V_{Ui} \right)}} \right)}}$$R_{eq} = {1\text{/}\left( {\frac{1}{R_{0}} + \frac{1}{R_{1}} + \ldots + \frac{1}{R_{L - 1}}} \right)}$

The constant R_(ee)/L does not depend on the write algorithm and thuswould be assigned the value of 1 for normalization.

Notation 5 (Maximal voltage disturb): the maximum voltage drop over anarray cell that was not meant to be changed is denoted with V_(MD):

V _(MD)(S)=max(S)=max{V _(U1) , V _(U2), . . . }

Notation 6 (Cell disturb and array size constraints): wordline write cantolerate a limited amount of resistance drift caused by voltage disturb.Therefore, the maximal voltage drop over cells which were not meant tobe changed is constrained by up to V_(PEAK). Memory array size islimited by the peak of redundant power dissipation, denoted withP_(PEAK). Clearly:

V _(PEAK) ≥V _(MD)(S)

P _(PEAK) ≥P _(U)(S)

The constraints depend on each other as would be noted when performingpower and disturb optimization.

B. Electric Model of Write Operation

In a SET operation, a target wordline is biased with V_(PP)(V) andbitlines of cells that are meant to be written to LRS are grounded. Theunselected WL/BL are assigned with V_(WL)/V_(BL) parameters as shown inFIG. 2. In a RESET operation, the same voltages are assigned whilereplacing WL to BL and vice-versa (in writing cells to HRS in the samewordline).

FIG. 2 illustrates parametric modeling of array cell voltage-dropsduring a write operation in cross-point phase-change random accessmemory (PRAM), according to an exemplary embodiment of the inventiveconcept. The selected cells to be SET to LRS are with voltage drop V,and variables V_(WL)/V_(BL) are assigned to unselected wordlines andbitlines. Analysis shows that there are four types for voltage drops onarray cells: I. Target cells with V; II. Cells that are on the samebitline with target written cells are with voltage drop V_(WL); III.Cells that are on the same wordline with written cells are V-V_(BL) andIV. Cells that do not belong to one of the previous groups getV_(WL)-V_(BL) voltage drop. The RESET process has similar analysis.

Observing the framework of voltage drops on array cells, there are fourpossibilities:

I. Target Cells to LRS

V₁=V_(PP)

II. Cells that Share the Same Bitline with Target LRS Cell

V₂=V_(WL)

III. Cells on the Target WL that are Meant for IIRS

V ₃ =V _(PP) −V _(BL)

IV. Other Cells that do Not Share WL/BL with LRS Cells

V ₄ =V _(WL)−V_(BL)

The amount of cells of each type is evaluated for power purposes, andtherefore, it would be sufficient to simplify and assume that the numberof cells in HRS is equal to those in LRS (IID Bernoulli-½ distributionwith randomizer). Therefore, write SET addresses of half the wordlinecells:

G(V ₁)=G(V ₃)=½N

G(V ₂)=G(V ₄)=½N(M−1)

C. Optimization for Minimum Average Disturb and Power

Average voltage disturbs over unwanted cells and power consumption arecorrelated, hence both can be optimized by minimizing the redundantpower. The power function with set S of voltage types I to IV and thecalculated affected cells is:

${P_{U}(S)} = {{\sum_{V_{Ui} \in S}\left( {V_{Ui}^{2} \cdot {G\left( V_{Ui} \right)}} \right)} = {{\frac{N}{2}V_{PP}^{2}} + {\frac{N\left( {M - 1} \right)}{2}V_{WL}^{2}} + {\frac{N}{2}\left( {V_{PP} - V_{BL}} \right)^{2}} + {\frac{N\left( {M - 1} \right)}{2}\left( {V_{WL} - V_{BL}} \right)^{2}}}}$

The power function should be minimized subject to constraints that V₁ toV₄ do not exceed V_(PEAK) or below −V_(PEAK):

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix}{{- V_{PEAK}} \leq V_{WL} \leq V_{PEAK}} \\{{- V_{PEAK}} \leq {V_{PP} - V_{BL}} \leq V_{PEAK}} \\{{- V_{PEAK}} \leq {V_{WL} - V_{BL}} \leq V_{PEAK}}\end{matrix} \right.$

Optimization of the given function is performed by finding maxima/minimapoints:

$\frac{\partial P_{U}}{\partial V_{WL}} = {{{N\left( {M - 1} \right)}V_{WL}} + {{N\left( {M - 1} \right)}\left( {V_{WL} - V_{BL}} \right)}}$

Equalizing the derivation by V_(WL) to zero, results in:

$V_{WL} = \frac{V_{BL}}{2}$

Same analysis for the derivation by V_(BL) results in:

$\frac{\partial P_{U}}{\partial V_{BL}} = {{N\left( {V_{PP} - V_{BL}} \right)} - {{N\left( {M - 1} \right)}\left( {V_{WL} - V_{BL}} \right)}}$

Again, equalizing the derivation by V_(BL) to zero, results in:

$V_{BL} = \frac{{\left( {M - 1} \right)V_{BL}} + V_{PP}}{M}$

The extremum point:

$V_{BL} = {\frac{2}{M + 1}V_{PP}}$ $V_{WL} = {\frac{1}{M + 1}V_{PP}}$

The analysis of the extremurn type is:

$\frac{\partial P_{U}}{{\partial V_{WL}}{\partial V_{BL}}} = {- {N\left( {M - 1} \right)}}$$\frac{\partial^{2}P_{U}}{\partial V_{WL}^{2}} = {2\; {N\left( {M - 1} \right)}}$$\frac{\partial^{2}P_{U}}{\partial V_{BL}^{2}} = {{{N\left( {M - 1} \right)} + N} = {NM}}$${{\frac{\partial^{2}P_{U}}{\partial V_{WL}^{2}} \cdot \frac{\partial^{2}P_{U}}{\partial V_{BL}^{2}}} - \left( \frac{\partial P_{U}}{{\partial V_{WL}}{\partial V_{BL}}} \right)^{2}} = {{N^{2}\left( {M^{2} - 1} \right)} > 0}$

Therefore the point is not a saddle and is either maximum or minimum.

Since

$\frac{\partial^{2}P_{U}}{\partial V_{WL}^{2}} > {0\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} \frac{\partial^{2}P_{U}}{\partial V_{BL}^{2}}} > 0$

(M,N) are integers larger than 1) it is a minimum.

The value of M is expected to be large and may shift the optimal pointout of constrained peak values. Parameterizing V_(PEAK) to α a fractionof V_(PP):

V_(PEAK)=αV_(PP)

Would result in corresponding constraints:

${{- \alpha} \leq \frac{1}{M + 1} \leq {{\alpha \mspace{14mu} {and}} - \alpha} \leq \frac{M - 1}{M + 1} \leq \alpha}\mspace{14mu}$

The requirement of

${\frac{M - 1}{M + 1} \leq \alpha}\;$

with a large M would require a peak voltage that is close to V_(PP) andthe current optimization may change the resistance of neighbor cells.However, the requirement of −V_(PEAK)≤V_(PP)−V_(BL)≤V_(PEAK) holds forcells in the same wordline that are meant to be written to HRS duringRESET. Therefore, disturb on those cells can be tolerated in the SETphase, since the consecutive write step will correct it.

The following RESET phase voltages have to be re-optimized since itcannot tolerate disturbs. Unselected WL and BL voltages depend on anαV_(PP) value. We analyze the power function based on α to obtain thecoefficients C_(WL) and C_(BL) which would be multiplied by V_(PP) toobtain the optimal unselected W_(L) and B_(L) voltages:

V _(BL) =C _(BL)(α)V _(PP)

V _(WL) =C _(WL)(α)V _(PP)

Results of the constrained optimization are:

${C_{BL}(\alpha)} = \left\{ {{\begin{matrix}{0.9965 - {0.9934\; \alpha}} & {\alpha \geq {1\text{/}3}} \\0 & {else}\end{matrix}{C_{WL}(\alpha)}} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}{0.4982 - {0.4967\; \alpha}} & {\alpha \geq {1\text{/}3}} \\0 & {else}\end{matrix} \right.} \right.$

FIG. 3 illustrates a power function (P_(U)) versus unselected WL/BLvoltages α=½.

Optimization results are verified by simulation and are depicted inFIGS. 4A and 4B. For example, if write voltage V_(PP)=1[V],V_(PEAK)=V_(PP)/2, the corresponding voltages are V_(WL)=C_(WL)=0.5[V]and V_(BL)=C_(BL)=0.25 [V].

More specifically, FIG. 4A illustrates optimization results for minimumaverage disturbs and power consumption, according to an exemplaryembodiment of the inventive concept. The graph of FIG. 4A shows theoptimal voltage coefficients for unselected WLs and. BLs during a writeoperation versus Alpha. It is can be seen that given the constraint ofV_(PEAK)<αV_(PP), the desired voltages are zero. The values have to bemultiplied by V_(PP) for nominal voltage. For example, if V_(PP)=2V,V_(PEAK)=1V, then unselected V_(WL)=1V and V_(BL)=0.5V.

The write scheme that minimizes the average voltage disturb and poweraccording to an exemplary embodiment of the inventive concept isillustrated in FIGS. 5A and 5B.

FIG. 5A illustrates a SET phase of the write scheme. As shown in FIG.5A, V_(PP) is applied to a target wordline (505), and bitlines of cellsto be written to LRS are grounded (510). Next, unselected bitlinesvoltages are set to

${V_{BL} = {\frac{2}{M + 1}{V_{PP}(515)}}},$

and unselected wordlines voltages are set to

$V_{WL} = {\frac{1}{M + 1}{{V_{PP}(520)}.}}$

FIG. 5B illustrates a RESET phase of the write scheme. As shown in FIG.5B, V_(PP) is applied to a target bitline (525), and wordlines of cellsto be written to HRS are grounded (530). Then, it is determined ifV_(PEAK)≥V_(PP)/3 (535). If V_(PEAK)≥V_(PP)/3, the unselected wordlinesvoltage is set to V_(WL)=(0.9965−0.9934 α)V_(PP) (540). In addition, ifV_(PEAK)≥V_(PP)/3, the unselected bitlines voltage is set toV_(BL)=(0.4982−0.4967 α)V_(PP) (545). In the event that V_(PEAK) is not≥V_(PP)/3, the unselected wordlines voltage is set to zero (550) and theunselected bitlines voltage is set to zero (555).

D. Optimization for Minimum Peak Disturb

The minimal peak disturb approach is provided to reduce V_(MD)(S) asmuch as possible. As V_(MD)(S) depends on the set of voltages S, thefollowing constrained optimization is considered:

min(|V _(WL) |,|V _(PP) −V _(BL) |,|V _(WL) −V _(BL)|)

Subject to:

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix}{{{- \alpha}\; V_{PP}} \leq V_{WL} \leq {\alpha \; V_{PP}}} \\{{{- \alpha}\; V_{PP}} \leq {V_{PP} - V_{BL}} \leq {\alpha \; V_{PP}}} \\{{{- \alpha}\; V_{PP}} \leq {V_{WL} - V_{BL}} \leq {\alpha \; V_{PP}}}\end{matrix} \right.$

The solution depends on the voltage of α. If α<⅓ there do not existvoltages that satisfy the constraints. If α≥⅓, the solution is:

V_(BL)=2/3V_(PP)

In this case

V _(MD)(S)=⅓V _(PP).

Now we now observe that peak disturb is not required in cells of typeIII, −αV_(PP)≤V_(PP)−V_(BL)≤αV_(PP) during the SET phase, since thosewould be changed to HRS during reset. Therefore, we can reduce writedisturb to zero in all cells that are not on the target wordline duringthe SET operation and use the above-described voltage optimization forthe RESET phase. In this scheme, the write disturb can be reduced by50%.

The write process for minimal perk disturb per cell according to anexemplary embodiment of the inventive concept is illustrated in FIG. 6.

As shown in FIG. 6, in a SET phase: V_(PP) is applied to a targetwordline (605), bitlines of cells to be written to LRS are grounded(610), and unselected wordlines and bitlines are grounded (615). In aRESET phase: V_(PP) is applied to a target bitline (620), wordlines ofcells to be written to HRS are grounded (625), unselected wordlinesvoltages are set to V_(WL)=2V_(PP)/3 (630) and unselected bitlinesvoltages are set to V_(BL)=V_(PP)/3 (635).

Gain Analysis and Implementations

Hereinafter, the write schemes discussed above and illustrated in FIGS.5A, 5B and 6 will be compared to conventional write schemes. The writescheme of FIGS. 5A and 5B will be referred to as Algorithm 1 and thewrite scheme of FIG. 6 will be referred to as Algorithm 2.

For comparison in power consumption, we used Algorithm 1 with α=½ forpeak write disturb V_(PP)/2 (same as V/2 scheme) and Algorithm 2 has apeak of V_(PP)/3 (similar to V/3 scheme) but it is only applied at theRESET phase. Power was calculated as described in the Electric Model ofWrite Operation section above.

Results are depicted in FIG. 7. In reference to FIG. 7, we can observethat Algorithm 1 with α=½ has 50% and 25% reduction in write disturb and70% and 80% power reduction comparing to V/2 and V/3 write schemes,respectively. Analysis of algorithm 2 shows 66% and 50% less writedisturb and 55% and 70% less power regarding V/2 and V/3 schemes. Thegain difference from the conventional schemes is presented in FIG. 8.

Implementation of Algorithms 1 and 2 requires support of a WL/BL voltageregulator in a power supply chip module. Algorithms 1 and 2 also requireproper program software at the chip embedded microcontroller to managethe write operation.

FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating a phase change memory deviceaccording to an exemplary embodiment of the inventive concept.

Examples of phase change memory devices and systems for use inaccordance with exemplary embodiments of the inventive concept aredescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,134,866 entitled “Phase Change MemoryDevices and Systems, and Related Programming Methods,” the disclosure ofwhich is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

Referring to FIG. 9, a phase change memory device 200 comprises a memorycell array 210 wherein each memory cell stores N-bit data. (N is aninteger greater than 0). Although not shown in detail in FIG. 9, memorycell array 210 comprises a plurality of rows corresponding to word linesand columns corresponding to bit lines, and memory cells arranged in amatrix at intersections between the bit lines and word lines.

Each of the memory cells in memory cell array 210 typically comprises aswitching device and a resistor. In general, the switching device may beembodied by various elements such as a metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS)transistor or a diode. In addition, each memory cell in memory cellarray 210 is an over-writable memory cell. Examples of memory cells thatcould be used in memory cell array 210 are described in U.S. Pat. No.6,928,022 entitled “Write Drive Circuit in Phase Change Memory Deviceand Method for Applying Write Current”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,967,865 entitled“Low-Current and High-Speed Phase-Change Memory Devices and Methods ofDriving The Same”, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,982,913 entitled “Data ReadCircuit for Use in a Semiconductor Memory and a Memory Thereof”. Therespective disclosures of these patents are hereby incorporated byreference.

A row select circuit 220 selects at least one word line among theplurality of word lines in response to a row address RA, and a rowselect circuit 230 selects a subset of the plurality of bit lines inresponse to a column address CA. A control logic unit 240 is configuredto control overall operations of phase change memory device 200 inresponse write/read commands from an external source. A high voltagegenerating circuit 250 is controlled by control logic unit 240, and isconfigured to generate a high voltage used by row and column selectcircuits 220 and 230 and a write driver circuit 290. For example, highvoltage generating circuit 250 may comprise a charge pump. However,those skilled in the art will recognize that high voltage generatingcircuit 250 could be embodied by a variety of other elements besides acharge pump.

A first sense amplifier circuit 260, labeled RSA, is controlled bycontrol logic unit 240, and senses cell data through bit lines selectedby column select circuit 230 in a normal read operation. The sensed datais output via a data input/output buffer circuit 270. First senseamplifier circuit 260 is connected to a data bus RDL and applies sensecurrent I_SENSE to data bus RDL in the normal read operation. A secondsense amplifier circuit 280, labeled VSA, is also controlled by controllogic unit 240 and senses cell data through the bit lines selected bycolumn select circuit 230 using program data stored in data input/outputbuffer circuit 270 during the verify read operation. Second senseamplifier circuit 280 variably applies verify current I_SET or I_RESETto the selected bit lines according to program data temporarily storedin data input/output buffer circuit 270.

Cell data sensed by second sense amplifier circuit 280 is applied tocontrol logic unit 240. Control logic unit 240 determines whether or notthe cell data sensed by second sense amplifier circuit 280 is identicalto the program data stored in data input/output circuit 270. Controllogic unit 240 controls write driver circuit 290 according a result ofthis determination. For instance, where the program data is determinedto be identical to the sensed data, control logic unit 240 does notgenerate set and reset pulse signals corresponding to program data. Onthe other hand, where the program data value is determined not to beidentical to the sensed data, control logic unit 240 generates set andreset pulse signals corresponding to the program data, or in otherwords, a program loop is repeated.

With each repetition of the program loop, control logic unit 240controls write drive circuit 290 such an amount of a write currentI_SET_W or I_RESET_W applied to selected bit lines in the program loopincreases or decreases gradually. A bias voltage generating circuit 300is controlled by control logic unit 240, and is configured to generatebias voltages to be applied to first and second sense amplifier circuits260 and 280 and write driver circuit 290, respectively.

The phase change memory device 200 may be part of a memory system thatincludes a memory controller.

The memory controller may include a microprocessor, a read-only memory(ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a memory interface, and a bus. Theelements of the memory controller may be electrically connected to eachother through the bus.

The microprocessor controls the overall operation of the memory systemincluding the memory controller. The microprocessor is a circuit thatcontrols other elements by generating control signals. When power issupplied to the memory system, the microprocessor drives firmware (e.g.,stored in the ROM) for operating the memory system on the RAM, therebycontrolling the overall operation of the memory system. According to anexemplary embodiment of the inventive concept, the microprocessor mayalso issue instructions for controlling operations of other elements ofthe memory controller including, for example, some or all of the ROM,RAM, memory interface, and a bus. According to an exemplary embodimentof the inventive concept, any operations described herein as beingperformed by the memory controller may be performed by, or under thecontrol of, the microprocessor. According to an exemplary embodiment ofthe inventive concept, any operations described herein as beingperformed by the memory controller may be performed by, or under thecontrol of, the microprocessor executing instructions that correspond tothe operations and are included in program code (e.g., stored in theROM).

While a driving firmware code of the memory system is stored in the ROM,exemplary embodiments of the inventive concept are not limited thereto.The firmware code can also be stored in a portion of the memory device200 other than the ROM. Therefore, the control or intervention of themicroprocessor may encompass not only the direct control of themicroprocessor but also the intervention of firmware which is softwaredriven by the microprocessor.

The RAM, which is a memory serving as a buffer, may store an initialcommand, data, and various variables input from a host or themicroprocessor, or data output from the memory device 200. The RAM maystore data and various parameters and variables input to and output fromthe memory device 200.

The memory interface may serve as an interface between the memorycontroller and the memory device 200. The memory interface is connectedto an I/O pad of the memory device 200 and may exchange data with theI/O pad. In addition, the memory interfitce may create a commandsuitable for the memory device 200 and provide the created command tothe I/O pad of the memory device 200. The memory interface provides acommand to be executed by the memory device 200 and an address of thememory device 200.

It is to be understood that the above described methods of the inventiveconcept may be carried out by one or more of the above describedelements of the controller and memory device 200.

It is to be further understood that components described herein andillustrated in drawings may be implemented with software, hardware, or acombination thereof, for example. In an exemplary embodiment of theinventive concept, the software may be a machine code, firmware, anembedded code, and application software. For example, the hardware mayinclude an electrical circuit, an electronic circuit, a processor, acomputer, an integrated circuit, integrated circuit cores, or acombination thereof.

The write schemes discussed above and illustrated in FIGS. 5A, 5B and 6addressed single-level cell (SLC) architecture. It is to be understood,however, that their adaptation to multi-level cell (MLC), either 4 or 8levels or any other, is straightforward by supplying the relevantvoltages, and other multi-phase scenarios such as RESET-before-SET orany composition that considers the write time in addition to voltagemagnitude.

Conclusions

PRAMS have to be packed in an efficient array structure in order toreflect device behavior in a product specification. In data storageapplications, cost-per-bit is very important, and currently the densesttopology is with cross-point array structures.

Although cross-point structures achieve competitive cell size, they havedrawbacks. One shortcoming is the cell disturb and redundant powerdissipation during write operation. Disturbs are the voltage drops overcells which were meant to remain in their resistance state, and maycause data errors. Redundant power is consumed by parasitic currents andlimits the array size, thus blocking the cross-point array fromachieving its density potential.

Optimizing the write process has inherent conflicts. Setting low peakwrite disturb by certain voltage configurations limits cell's resistancechange and prevents errors, but causes increased redundant powerconsumption that dissipates in cells that are not involved in the writemechanism. The other aspect of the matter is that using other sets forvoltages to reduce power may result in more disturbs and thus harm dataintegrity.

In this disclosure, we presented two novel write algorithms that achievebetter characteristics that conventional write schemes. In both of thewrite algorithms, we observe that write has at least two time phaseswith different voltages, and consequently disturbs in cells on the samewordline in the first phase will be corrected in the second one.Therefore, the early step is optimized for power reduction. In the firstalgorithm, we modeled PRAM cross-point topology and explored optimalvoltages for minimal power. The second algorithm was constrained to peakdisturb. Analysis shows that the write algorithms achieve up to 66% lessdisturb and 80% lower power than the conventional write schemes.

The novel write algorithms presented herein enable PRAM array size to beenlarged and PRAM reliability to be enhanced.

While the present inventive concept has been described with reference toexemplary embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to those skilled inthe art that various changes and modifications may be made theretowithout departing from the spirit and scope of the present inventiveconcept as defined by the attached claims.

1. A method for writing memory cells in a nonvolatile memory devicecomprising wordlines overlapping bitlines, the method comprising: in afirst phase: applying a program pulse voltage to a target wordline;grounding bitlines of memory cells to be written to a first resistancestate; setting a bitline voltage of unselected bitlines; and setting awordline voltage of unselected wordlines; in a second phase: applyingthe program pulse voltage to a target bitline; grounding wordlines ofthe memory cells to be written to a second resistance state; setting thewordline voltage of the unselected wordlines to a first value if a peakof a maximum voltage drop over memory cells which were not meant, to bechanged is greater than or equal to a second value, and setting thewordline voltage to zero if the peak of the maximum voltage drop is notgreater than or equal to the second value; and setting the bitlinevoltage of the unselected bit lines to a third value if the peak of themaximum voltage drop is greater than or equal to the second value, andsetting the bitline voltage to zero if the pedk of the maximum voltagedrop is not greater than or equal to the second value.
 2. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the first phase is a set phase and the second phase isa reset phase.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the nonvolatile memorydevice is phase-change random access memory.
 4. The method of claim lwherein the first resistance state is a low resistance state the secondresistance state is a high resistance state.
 5. The method of claim 1,wherein the wordlines and the bitlines form an M×N array, wherein M andN are each integers greater than one, and wherein the bitline voltage ofthe unselected bitlines is represented by${V_{BL} = {\frac{2}{M + 1}V_{PP}}},$ where V_(BL) is the bitlinevoltage of the unselected bitlines and V_(PP) is the program, pulsevoltage.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the wordlines and thebitlines form an M×N array, wherein M and N are each integers greaterthan one, and wherein the wordline voltage of the unselected wordlinesis represented by ${V_{WL} = {\frac{1}{M + 1}V_{PP}}},$ where V_(WL) isthe wordline voltage of the unselected wordlines and V_(PP) is theprogram pulse voltage.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first valueis (0.9965-09934α) multiplied by the program pulse voltage, wherein α isa value between zero and one.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein thethird value is (0.4982-0.4967α) multiplied by the program pulse voltage,wherein α is a value between zero and one.
 9. The method of claim 8,wherein the second value is the program pulse voltage divided by
 3. 10.A method for writing memory cells in a nonvolatile memory devicecomprising wordlines overlapping bitlines, the method comprising: in afirst phase: applying a program pulse voltage to a target wordline;grounding bitlines of memory cells to be written to a first resistancestate; grounding unselected bitlines and unselected wordlines; in asecond phase: applying the program pulse voltage to a target bitline;grounding wordlines of the memory cells to be written to a secondresistance state; setting a wordline voltage of the unselectedwordlines; and setting a bitline voltage of unselected bitlines.
 11. Themethod of claim 10, wherein the fist phase is a set phase and the secondphase is a reset phase.
 12. The method of claim 10, wherein thenonvolatile memory device is phase-change random access memory.
 13. Themethod of claim 10, wherein the first resistance state is a lowresistance state the second resistance state is a high resista icestate.
 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the wordline voltage isrepresented by ${V_{WL} = \frac{2\; V_{PP}}{3}},$ where V_(WL) is thewordline voltage of the unselected wordlines in the second phase andV_(PP) is the program pulse voltage.
 15. The method of claim 10, whereinthe bitline voltage is represented by ${V_{BL} = \frac{V_{PP}}{3}},$where V_(BL) is the bitline voltage of the unselected bit lines in thesecond phase and V_(PP) is the program pulse voltage.
 16. A method forwiting memory cells in a nonvolatile memory device comprising wordlinesoverlapping bitlines, the method comprising: applying a program pulsevoltage to a target wordline; grounding bitlines of memory cells to bewritten to a first resistance state; setting a bitline voltage ofunselected bitlines; setting a wordline voltage of unselected wordlines;applying the program pulse voltage to a target bitline; groundingwordlines of the memory cells to be written to a second resistancestate; and setting the wordline voltage of the unselected wordlines to afirst value if a peak maximumvoltage drop of memory cells which were notmeant to be changed is greater than or equal to a second value.
 17. Themethod of claim 16, further comprising setting the wordline voltage tozero if the peak maximum voltage drop is not greater than or equal tothe second value.
 18. The method of claim 16, further composing: settingthe bitline voltage of the unselected bitlines to a third value if thepeak maximum voltage drop is greater than or equal to the second value.19. The method of claim 17, further comprising setting the bitlinevoltage to zero if the peak maximum voltage drop is not greater than orequal to the second value.
 20. The method of claim 16, wherein thenonvolatile memory device is phase-change random access memory.